31 July 2017
Following China, Russia Cracks Down on Internet Proxy Servers
On Saturday, Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a law banning the use of internet proxy servers in Russia. The law is designed to prevent Russians from accessing material on the internet that is banned in the country, including content that the Russian government regards as politically "extremist." The same day, Putin signed a new law designed to prevent Russians from using messaging applications anonymously: beginning in January, messaging application operators will have to establish the identities of the people who use their applications:
https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-putin-signs-vpn-law-internet/28648976.html
Russia's crackdown on proxy servers, including virtual private networks (VPNs), follows similar efforts in China to prevent internet users from accessing materials banned in China. (The Chinese government's censorship of the internet is far broader than the Russian government's: such sites as The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal and the BBC are frequently off-limits, while both Facebook and Google are banned entirely.) China also requires SIM card purchasers to show identification, in an effort to prevent untraceable telephone texting.
https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-putin-signs-vpn-law-internet/28648976.html
Russia's crackdown on proxy servers, including virtual private networks (VPNs), follows similar efforts in China to prevent internet users from accessing materials banned in China. (The Chinese government's censorship of the internet is far broader than the Russian government's: such sites as The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal and the BBC are frequently off-limits, while both Facebook and Google are banned entirely.) China also requires SIM card purchasers to show identification, in an effort to prevent untraceable telephone texting.
30 July 2017
Rural Russsia in Decline
Russia's rural villages -- long regarded as the soul of the country -- are slowly disappearing. The country's population is falling; over the next 35 years, the population is expected to shrink by more than ten percent. Moreover, young Russians are leaving the countryside for better economic opportunities in Russia's cities:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/29/world/europe/russia-population-changes.html?ref=todayspaper
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/29/world/europe/russia-population-changes.html?ref=todayspaper
28 July 2017
More Central Americans Seek Asylum in Mexico
Mexico has seen a dramatic increase this year in the number of asylum requests from Central American refugees:
https://www.economist.com/news/americas/21725601-donald-trump-hardens-united-states-border-more-asylum-seekers-opt-stay
https://www.economist.com/news/americas/21725601-donald-trump-hardens-united-states-border-more-asylum-seekers-opt-stay
Chinese-Russian Relationship Not as Friendly as It Appears
In recent years, Russia and China have established closer
economic and military ties. Beneath the surface, however, the relationship
between the two countries remains problematic. Russia is deeply concerned about
the rise of its neighbor. Russia has a declining population and the East Asian
portion of the country is sparsely settled and resource-rich, while China is
densely populated and short on some of the natural resources abundant in
Siberia. China is also nervous about Russia, which it sees as a potentially
dangerous nuclear-armed state in decline:
24 July 2017
History Repeating: Another Nigerian President on Prolonged Medical Leave
Nigerian President Muhammadu Buhari spent seven weeks in London at the beginning of the year, where he was treated for an undisclosed illness. In May, Buhari returned to London for further treatment; he has not been in Nigeria since. Vice-President Yemi Osinbajo is acting in President Buhari's stead; he claims to consult regularly with Buhari, and insists that Buhari will return to Nigeria soon.
Only seven years ago, another Nigerian President, Umaru Yar'Adua, died in office after a prolonged sojourn in Saudi Arabia for medical treatment. With that experience in mind, senior Nigerian politicians are jostling for position -- just in case:
https://www.economist.com/news/middle-east-and-africa/21725289-muhammadu-buhari-has-been-absent-london-clinic-months-would-be-successors
Only seven years ago, another Nigerian President, Umaru Yar'Adua, died in office after a prolonged sojourn in Saudi Arabia for medical treatment. With that experience in mind, senior Nigerian politicians are jostling for position -- just in case:
https://www.economist.com/news/middle-east-and-africa/21725289-muhammadu-buhari-has-been-absent-london-clinic-months-would-be-successors
Mexico's "War on Drugs" Reaches the Capital
Until last week, Mexico City had been spared the large-scale violence that has accompanied the Mexican government's decade-long war on narco-trafficking. Indeed, the city's Mayor, Miguel Angel Mancera, had even claimed that the country's drug gangs do not operate in the capital. Last Thursday, however, 1300 police officers and marines battled drug traffickers in a midday Mexico City firefight. Eight suspected gangsters were killed:
http://www.latimes.com/world/mexico-americas/la-fg-mexico-shootout-20170721-story.html
http://www.latimes.com/world/mexico-americas/la-fg-mexico-shootout-20170721-story.html
19 July 2017
On the State of Freedom and Democracy in China
When Hong Kong returned to Chinese sovereignty in 1997, the
Chinese government promised Hong Kong residents that they would continue to
enjoy the freedom of speech, the freedom of the press and the right to
demonstrate that they had enjoyed under British rule. The Chinese government
also promised to introduce fully democratic procedures for electing the
Legislative Council that governs the city, and for selecting the City’s Chief Executive.
In recent years, the Chinese government has restricted some of the freedoms
that Hong Kongers have traditionally enjoyed (though Hong Kong residents still
enjoy far greater freedoms than other Chinese citizens); the Chinese government
has also made it clear that it has no intention of introducing procedures for selecting
the city’s Legislative Council and Chief Executive that are “democratic” in the
Western sense of the term. As a result, many young Hong Kongers have begun to
agitate for greater autonomy for Hong Kong, and a few have even begun to call
for Hong Kong’s independence from China. Chinese President Xi Jinping recently visited
Hong Kong; in his visit, Xi made it clear that any further discussion of
greater autonomy for the city – let alone Hong Kong independence – is impermissible:
Xi also recently appointed Cai Qi Secretary of the Beijing
Municipal Committee of the Chinese Communist Party. Cai’s appointment as Party
chief in Beijing further consolidates Xi’s control of the Party; Cai replaces Guo Jinlong, who was seen as loyal
to Hu Jintao, Xi’s predecessor as President of China and General Secretary
(head) of the Chinese Communist Party. Interestingly, Cai was once an important
presence on Tencent Weibo (a Chinese microblog service equivalent to Twitter).
In the past few years, as he has been appointed to increasingly important positions,
Cai has curtailed his tweeting:
Liu Xiaobo, China’s foremost dissident, died last week. In
2009, Liu was sentenced to eleven years in jail for starting an online petition
that called for, among other things, competitive multiparty elections and an
end to restrictions on freedom of speech. It was Liu’s fourth and longest
prison sentence for publicly advocating political liberalization in China. In
recognition of his efforts, Liu was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2010 -- an
award that has never been mentioned in the Chinese press. (Liu’s advocacy of
democracy and freedom in China is much better known In the West than in his own
country). Although Liu is dead, thousands of other Chinese citizens remain in
prison for non-violent advocacy of political reform:
Brexit Threatens the Peace of Northern Ireland
The island of Ireland was partitioned in the 1920s: six northeastern counties, known as Northern Ireland, remained part of the United Kingdom while the other 26 counties (now known as the Republic of Ireland) gained their independence from the United Kingdom. From 1969 to 1999, political violence flared in Northern Ireland between "nationalist" paramilitary groups (such as the Irish Republican Army) that wanted Northern Ireland to secede from the United Kingdom and join the Republic of Ireland, and "unionist" paramilitary groups (such as the Ulster Protestant Volunteers) that favored continued Northern Irish union with Great Britain in the United Kingdom. The "Troubles" claimed over 3500 lives (in a region of fewer than 2 million people); they ended (for the most part) with the implementation of the Good Friday Agreement of 1998.
The Good Friday Agreement was possible largely because both the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland were members of the European Union. This meant that goods, services and people could move freely between the Republic of Ireland, Northern Ireland and the rest of the United Kingdom, without inspections or passport formalities -- at least they could once the violence stopped. Indeed, people from the Republic of Ireland and the United Kingdom had the right to live and work in both countries -- and everywhere else in the European Union, for that matter. Finally, whether Northern Ireland was part of the United Kingdom or part of the Republic of Ireland seemed to matter less in an era in which all of the countries in Europe were transferring more and more of their sovereignty (i.e., final control over what goes on inside their borders) to a continent-wide political entity.
Brexit changes this status quo dramatically: Britain will leave the European Union in less than two years, while the Republic of Ireland will remain a member. Brexit raises the possibility that a "real" border -- with passport controls and customs inspections -- will be established between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. This would not only outrage nationalists, it would frustrate nationalists and unionists in Northern Ireland whose livelihoods depend on the rapid movement of goods between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Brexit thus threatens the Northern Irish peace process, and the prosperity of Northern Ireland. (Brexit makes no economic sense for the rest of the UK, either; it's also bad news for the Republic of Ireland.) Earlier this month, The Economist looked at the issues involved in some detail:
https://www.economist.com/news/britain/21725012-nobody-wants-hard-border-which-might-include-passport-and-customs-controls-yet-there-no
The Good Friday Agreement was possible largely because both the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland were members of the European Union. This meant that goods, services and people could move freely between the Republic of Ireland, Northern Ireland and the rest of the United Kingdom, without inspections or passport formalities -- at least they could once the violence stopped. Indeed, people from the Republic of Ireland and the United Kingdom had the right to live and work in both countries -- and everywhere else in the European Union, for that matter. Finally, whether Northern Ireland was part of the United Kingdom or part of the Republic of Ireland seemed to matter less in an era in which all of the countries in Europe were transferring more and more of their sovereignty (i.e., final control over what goes on inside their borders) to a continent-wide political entity.
Brexit changes this status quo dramatically: Britain will leave the European Union in less than two years, while the Republic of Ireland will remain a member. Brexit raises the possibility that a "real" border -- with passport controls and customs inspections -- will be established between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. This would not only outrage nationalists, it would frustrate nationalists and unionists in Northern Ireland whose livelihoods depend on the rapid movement of goods between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Brexit thus threatens the Northern Irish peace process, and the prosperity of Northern Ireland. (Brexit makes no economic sense for the rest of the UK, either; it's also bad news for the Republic of Ireland.) Earlier this month, The Economist looked at the issues involved in some detail:
https://www.economist.com/news/britain/21725012-nobody-wants-hard-border-which-might-include-passport-and-customs-controls-yet-there-no
Big Brother is Watching You
Several agencies of the Mexican government have purchased a spyware program called Pegasus from its Israeli manufacturer. The spyware is supposed to be used only against suspected criminals, and only when a search warrant has been issued by a Mexican court. Earlier this year, however, the software turned up on the smartphones of leading critics of the government, including human rights advocates and journalists. Predictably, the revelation that someone in the Mexican government is spying illegally on dissidents provoked outrage:
https://www.economist.com/news/americas/21723889-investigation-finds-spyware-phones-journalists-and-activists-mexicos-government
https://www.economist.com/news/americas/21723889-investigation-finds-spyware-phones-journalists-and-activists-mexicos-government